Anuncio

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Los pegostes de Cronos

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Hora
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Palabras encadenadas en ingles.¿¿¿???

    A question may be either a linguistic expression used to make a request for information, or else the request itself made by such an expression. This information is provided with an answer.

    Questions are normally put or asked using interrogative sentences. But they can also be put by imperative sentences, which normally express commands: "Tell me what 2 + 2 is"; conversely, some expressions, such as "Would you pass the butter?", have the grammatical form of questions but actually function as requests for action, not for answers. (A phrase such as this could, theoretically, also be viewed not merely as a request but as an observation of the other person's desire to comply with the request given.)

    * 1 Varieties of questions
    o 1.1 Questions have a number of uses. 'Raising a question' may guide the questioner along an avenue of research (see Socratic method). A rhetorical question is asked in order to make a point, and does not expect an answer (often the answer is implied or obvious). Pre-suppositional questions, such as "Have you stopped beating your wife?" may be used as a joke or to embarrass an audience, because any answer a person could give would imply more information than he was willing to affirm. Questions can also be titles of works of art and literature (e.g. Leo Tolstoy's short story How Much Land Does a Man Need? and the movie What About Bob?). McKenzie lists 17 types of questions in his "Questioning Toolkit" and suggests that thinkers must orchestrate and combine these types in his article "Punchy Question Combinations". Examples of his question types include the irreverent question, the apparently irrelevant question, the hypothetical question and the unanswerable question.

    In research projects

    1. Descriptive question, used primarily to describe the existence of some thing or process.
    2. Relational question, designed to look at the relationships between two or more variables.
    3. Causal question, designed to determine whether one or more variables causes or affects one or more outcome variables.[1]

    In surveys (there are a few types of questions)

    1. Dichotomous questions, usually these questions require yes/no answers or require a person to answer by choosing an option(s) from a multiple choice of possible answers.
    2. Nominal questions, these types of questions are designed to inquire about a level of quantitative measure. Usually these questions form correlations between a number and a concept. For example:

    Occupational Class: 1= Moderate 2= Severe 3= etc. [2]

    1. Qualifying questions (a.k.a. filter questions, or contingency questions) These types of questions are designed to determine if the individual answering the question needs to continue on to answer subsequential questions.

    Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational ~~~~~~ives (Categories of questions)

    * Knowledge

    who, what, when, where, how..? Describe...?

    * Comprehension

    retell...

    * Application

    How is...an example of...?; how is...related to...?; why is...significant?

    * Analysis

    What are the parts or features of...? Classify...according to...;

    * Synthesis

    what would you infer from...? What ideas can you add to...? How would you design a new..? What would happen if you combined...? What solutions would you suggest for...?

    * Evaluation

    do you agree that...? What do you think about?...What is the most important..? Place the following in order of priority...? How would you decide about...? What criteria would you use to assess...? [3]

    Grammar

    Languages may use both syntax and prosody to distinguish interrogative sentences (which pose questions) from declarative sentences (which state propositions). Syntax refers to grammatical changes, such as moving words around or adding questions words; prosody refers to changes in tone of voice while speaking. Some syntactic devices used by languages for marking questions include:

    * A marked word order different from the usual word order in statements (see wh-movement). For example, French speakers may ask questions using inversion, and English speakers may do so in sentences with auxiliary verbs (as in "Do you want...?" as opposed to "You do want....").
    * An interrogative mood or some other verb inflection such as the subjunctive mood
    * A grammatical particle (cf. Japanese ka, Mandarin 吗 ma)
    * Replacing a word in a declarative sentence with an interrogative word (also known as a wh-word) such as "what". For example, in English the declarative "you want something" can be changed into a question by replacing 'something' with 'what' and moving it, as well as adding the auxiliary "do" ("What do you want?"); in Mandarin, however, only the first step is necessary (你要什么? nǐ yào shénme, lit. "you want what?")

    Non-syntactic devices include:

    * A different intonation pattern (often a raised pitch near the end of the sentence) - see Intonation (linguistics)
    * (In written language) distinctive punctuation, such as the question mark

    Combinations of any of the above are possible, as well as alternative patterns for different types of questions. For example, English employs the syntactic approach (word order change) and the tonal pattern for common questions, but resorts to just raising the tone while leaving the word order as it is for focused (emphatic) questions such as "You did what?". Spanish changes the word order only when interrogative pronouns are involved (not in yes-no questions). In Chinese, the word order remains the same for questions as for statements, with the particle added to create a wh-interrogative in situ.

    In languages written in the Latin alphabet or Cyrillic alphabet, a question mark at the end of the sentence identifies questions orthographically. In Spanish, an additional mark is placed at the beginning (e.g. ¿Cómo está usted?).

    "Negative questions," are interrogative sentences which contain negation in their phrasing, such as "Shouldn't you be working?". These can have different ways of expressing affirmation and denial from the standard form of question, and they can be confusing, since it is sometimes unclear whether the answer should be the opposite of the answer to the non-negated question. For example, if one does not have a passport, both "Do you have a passport?" "Don't you have a passport?" are properly answered with "No", despite apparently asking opposite questions. The Japanese language avoids this ambiguity. Answering "No" to the second of these in Japanese would mean, "I do have a passport".

    A similar ambiguous question in English is "Do you mind if...?" If the responder does not reply unambiguously "Yes, I do mind," if they do, or "No, I don't mind," if they don't, a simple "No" or "Yes" answer can lead to confusion, as a single "No" can seem like a "Yes, I do mind," as in "No, please don't do that," and a "Yes" can seem like a "No, I don't mind," as in "Yes, go ahead." An easy way to bypass this confusion would be to ask a non-negative question, such as "Is it all right with you if...?"

    Some languages have different particles (for example the French "si" and the German "doch") to answer negative questions (or negative statements) in an affirmative way.

    There are three types of sentences in the English language where the predicate can come before the subject. An interrogative sentence is one such one; for example, in "what did you buy?", the predicate "what" comes before the subject "you".

    Types

    * Yes/no-questions
    o Yes/no questions can be answered with a "yes" or "no", hence the name.
    * Wh-questions
    o Wh-questions use interrogative words to request information. In some languages, wh-movement may be involved. They cannot be answered with a yes or no.
    * Tag questions
    o Tag questions are a grammatical structure in which a declarative statement or an imperative is turned into a question by adding an interrogative fragment (the "tag"), such as "right"—for example, "You remembered the eggs, right?" Tag questions can be answered with a yes or no.

    Comment


    • Re: Preguntas y Respuestas

      Questions and answers

      The simplest questions implicitly or explicitly request information from a range (finite or infinite) of alternatives. When information purporting to be that requested is presented back to the questioner, the question is said to be answered. The information thus presented is called an answer. Answers may be correct or incorrect. They are incorrect if they present false information. If they present information from outside the proffered alternatives, they may be called wrong or simply inappropriate or irrelevant. This depends on the context, as do several other possibilities: Sometimes "I don't know" is an acceptable answer, sometimes even a correct answer. The same is true of "None of the above" and "There is no answer." An answer is the, or a, correct answer, if it presents true information which falls within the determined range of alternatives. Questions of this simplest sort usually begin with Who, what, which, where, when, does/do, is/are.

      Other questions do not so easily fit this mould. For example, questions beginning "Why" and "How" often request any information at all that will alleviate certain confusion in a person who wants to ask that question. Here the manner in which the information is presented might be more important than which information is presented; the questioner may even already know all of the information contained in the right answer, and merely needs it to be expressed in a more useful form.

      Ultimately, the interrogative pronouns (those beginning wh in addition to the word how), derive from the Proto-Indo-European root kwo- or kwi, the former of which was reflected in Proto-Germanic as xwa- or hwa-.[citation needed] The Proto-Indo-European root directly originated the Latin and Romance form qu- in words such as Latin quī ("which") and quando ("when"). In English, the gradual change of voiceless stops into voiceless fricatives (phase 1 of Grimm's law) during the development of Germanic languages is responsible for "wh-" of interrogatives. Although some varieties of American English and various Scottish dialects still preserve the original sound (i.e. [hw] rather than [w]), the majority only preserve the [w]. The words who, whom, whose, what and why, can all be considered to come from a single Old English word hwā, reflecting its masculine and feminine nominative (hwā), dative (hwām), genitive (hwæs), neuter nominative (hwæt), and instrumental of all genders (hwȳ, later hwī) respectively. Other interrogative words, such as which, how, where, as well as the now archaic whither derive either from compounds (which coming from a compound of hwā [what, who] and lic [like]), or other words from the same root (how deriving from hū).

      Comment


      • Re: Preguntas y Respuestas/Questions and answers..¿¿??

        Questions and answers

        The simplest questions implicitly or explicitly request information from a range (finite or infinite) of alternatives.
        When information purporting to be that requested is presented back to the questioner, the question is said to be answered.
        The information thus presented is called an answer.
        Answers may be correct or incorrect.
        They are incorrect if they present false information.
        If they present information from outside the proffered alternatives, they may be called wrong or simply inappropriate or irrelevant.
        This depends on the context, as do several other possibilities: Sometimes "I don't know" is an acceptable answer, sometimes even a correct answer. The same is true of "None of the above" and "There is no answer." An answer is the, or a, correct answer, if it presents true information which falls within the determined range of alternatives. Questions of this simplest sort usually begin with Who, what, which, where, when, does/do, is/are.

        Other questions do not so easily fit this mould. For example, questions beginning "Why" and "How" often request any information at all that will alleviate certain confusion in a person who wants to ask that question. Here the manner in which the information is presented might be more important than which information is presented; the questioner may even already know all of the information contained in the right answer, and merely needs it to be expressed in a more useful form.

        Ultimately, the interrogative pronouns (those beginning wh in addition to the word how), derive from the Proto-Indo-European root kwo- or kwi, the former of which was reflected in Proto-Germanic as xwa- or hwa-.[citation needed] The Proto-Indo-European root directly originated the Latin and Romance form qu- in words such as Latin quī ("which") and quando ("when"). In English, the gradual change of voiceless stops into voiceless fricatives (phase 1 of Grimm's law) during the development of Germanic languages is responsible for "wh-" of interrogatives. Although some varieties of American English and various Scottish dialects still preserve the original sound (i.e. [hw] rather than [w]), the majority only preserve the [w]. The words who, whom, whose, what and why, can all be considered to come from a single Old English word hwā, reflecting its masculine and feminine nominative (hwā), dative (hwām), genitive (hwæs), neuter nominative (hwæt), and instrumental of all genders (hwȳ, later hwī) respectively. Other interrogative words, such as which, how, where, as well as the now archaic whither derive either from compounds (which coming from a compound of hwā [what, who] and lic [like]), or other words from the same root (how deriving from hū).

        Comment


        • Re: ¿Un pequeño paso?..Haciendo preguntas,se aprende ¿¿??

          Learning

          Questions are used from the most elementary stage of learning to original research. In the scientific method, a question often forms the basis of the investigation and can be considered a transition between the observation and hypothesis stages. Students of all ages use questions in their learning of topics, and the skill of having learners creating "investigatable" questions is a central part of inquiry education. The Socratic method of questioning student responses may be used by a teacher to lead the student towards the truth without direct instruction, and also helps students to form logical conclusions.

          A widespread and accepted use of questions in an educational context is the assessment of students' knowledge through exams...

          Comment


          • Dios salve la razón:Asuntos y/o preguntas filosóficas ¿¿??

            Philosophical Questions

            The philosophical questions are conceptual, not factual questions.
            There are questions that are not fully answered by any other.
            Philosophy deals with questions that arise when people reflect on their lives and their world.
            Some philosophical questions are practical: for example, 'Is euthanasia justifiable?', 'Does the state have the right to censor pornography or restrict tobacco advertising?', 'To what extent are Mäori and Päkehä today responsible for decisions made by their ancestors?'.
            Other philosophical questions are more theoretical, although they often arise through thinking about practical issues. The questions just listed, for example, may prompt more general philosophical questions about the circumstances under which it may be morally justifiable to take a life, or about the extent to which the state may restrict the liberty of the individual. Some fascinating, 'classic', questions of Philosophy are speculative and theoretical and concern the nature of knowledge, reality and human existence: for example, 'What, if anything, can be known with certainty?', 'Is the mind essentially non-physical?', 'Are values absolute or relative?', 'Does the universe need explanation in terms of a Supreme Intelligence?', 'What, if anything, is the meaning or purpose of human existence?'
            Finally, the philosophical questions are typically about conceptual issues; they are often questions about our concepts and the relation between our concepts and the world they represent.

            See also

            * Debate
            * Doubt
            * Exclamation
            * Inquiry
            * Interrogate
            * Interrogative word
            * Interrogatory
            * Logic
            * Problem
            * Proposition
            * Question mark
            * Rhetorical question
            * Sentence (linguistics)
            * Sentence function
            * Statement
            * Truth

            References
            1. ^ Research Methods Knowledge Base
            2. ^ Research Methods Knowledge Base. Types of Questions. http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/questype.php
            3. ^ Types of Questions Based on Bloom's Taxonomy. (Bloom, et al., 1956).

            * C. L. Hamblin, "Questions", in: Paul Edwards (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
            * Georg Stahl, "Un développement de la logique des questions", in: Revue Philosophique de la France et de l'Etranger 88 (1963), 293-301.
            * Fieser, James , Lillegard, Norman (eds), Philosophical questions : readings and interactive guides, 2005.
            * McKenzie, Jamie, Leading questions: FNO Press, 2007.
            * McKenzie, Jamie, Learning to question to wonder to learn: FNO Press, 2005.
            * McKenzie, Jamie, "The Question Mark"
            * Muratta Bunsen, Eduardo, "Lo erotico en la pregunta", in: Aletheia 5 (1999), 65-74.
            * Smith, Joseph Wayne, Essays on ultimate questions: critical discussions of the limits of contemporary philosophical inquiry, Aldershot: Avebury, 1988.
            * Berti, Enrico, Soggetti di responsabilita: questioni di filosofia pratica, Reggio Emilia, 1993.

            Comment


            • Re: Como les fue ayer de inundaciones???

              Continuarán las lluvias fuertes e intensas en el país
              Nacional - Domingo 13 de septiembre (08:35 hrs)


              * Un canal de baja presión, la causa
              * La precipitación puede estar acompañada de tormenta eléctrica, granizo y viento moderado a fuerte


              El Financiero en línea

              México, 13 de septiembre .- En los estados de centro, oriente, sur y sureste del país se prevé potencial de lluvias fuertes a intensas, además de la Península de Yucatán, informó el Servicio Meteorológico Nacional (SMN).

              Asimismo, un canal de baja presión, localizado desde Texas, Estados Unidos, hasta el centro del país, y el flujo de humedad del Golfo de México originarán cielo medio nublado a nublado con lluvias ligeras a moderadas en el noreste, oriente y centro.

              En tanto que la onda tropical 30 provocará cielo medio nublado a nublado con lluvias fuertes puntualmente intensas sobre la Península de Yucatán y sureste del territorio nacional.

              Mientras que en el noroeste, occidente y sur se mantendrá con cielo medio nublado a nublado y lluvias ligeras a moderadas y puntualmente intensas, por el flujo de humedad del Océano Pacífico, Golfo de México y Mar Caribe.

              En la Península de Baja California, se mantendrá con cielo despejado a medio nublado y ambiente muy caluroso.

              En su boletín meteorológico, el organismo detacó que la lluvia puede estar acompañada de tormenta eléctrica, granizo y viento moderado a fuerte.

              En su pronóstico por regiones mencionó que para el Pacífico Norte se prevé cielo despejado a medio nublado, probabilidad de lluvia, temperaturas cálidas a extremadamente calurosas y viento de dirección variable de 25 a 40 kilómetros por hora.

              Para el Pacífico Centro se anuncia cielo medio nublado a nublado, probabilidad de lluvia, temperaturas cálidas a calurosas y viento dominante del oeste de 25 a 40 kilómetros por hora.

              Mientras que en el Pacífico Sur se estima la presencia de cielo medio nublado a nublado, probabilidad de lluvia, temperaturas cálidas a muy calurosas y viento dominante del sur de 25 a 40 kilómetros por hora.

              Se prevé para el Golfo de México cielo medio nublado a nublado, probabilidad de lluvia, temperaturas cálidas a calurosas y viento dominante del este de 25 a 40 kilómetros por hora.

              Indicó que en la Península de Yucatán se espera cielo medio nublado a nublado, probabilidad de lluvia, temperaturas calurosas a muy calurosas y viento de dirección variable de 25 a 40 kilómetros por hora.

              En el área de plataformas de la Sonda de Campeche dominará cielo medio nublado, probabilidad de lluvia, temperaturas muy calurosas y viento del norte y noreste de 25 a 40 kilómetros por hora.

              En la Mesa del Norte se tendrá cielo despejado a medio nublado, probabilidad de lluvia, temperaturas templadas a muy calurosas y viento dominante del norte de 25 a 40 kilómetros por hora.

              Para la Mesa Central se pronostica cielo medio nublado a nublado, probabilidad de lluvia, temperaturas frescas a cálidas y viento de dirección variable de 25 a 40 kilómetros por hora.

              Durante las últimas 24 horas la temperatura máxima registrada en el país ocurrió en Progreso, Yucatán con 38.5 grados centígrados, y la mínima en Toluca, estado de México con 10.4 grados centígrados.

              En su reporte de lluvias prevé precipitaciones pluviales intensas en Chiapas, Oaxaca, Puebla, Tabasco y Veracruz; fuertes en Campeche, Distrito Federal, Guerrero, estado de México, Michoacán, Quintana Roo y Yucatán.

              Así como lluvias moderadas en Colima, Guanajuato, Hidalgo, Jalisco, Morelos, Nayarit, Nuevo León, Querétaro, San Luis Potosí, Sinaloa, Tamaulipas, Tlaxcala y Zacatecas; y ligeras en Aguascalientes, Chihuahua, Coahuila, Durango y Sonora.(Con información de Notimex/JOT)

              Comment


              • Re: ~~Juguemos Bilingüe~~

                An opinion is a belief that may or may not be backed up with evidence, but which cannot be proved with that evidence. It is normally a subjective statement and may be the result of an emotion or an interpretation of facts; people may draw opposing opinions from the same facts.

                There can be the public opinion, or other types of opinion.

                In economics, philosophy, and other social sciences, analysis based on opinion is referred to as normative analysis (what ought to be), as opposed to positive analysis, which is based on scientific observation (what materially is or is experimentally demonstrable).

                Historically, the distinction of demonstrated knowledge and opinion was articulated by Ancient Greek philosophers. Plato's analogy of the divided line is a well-known illustration of the distinction between knowledge and opinion. Opinions can be persuasive, but only the facts they are based on can be said to be true or false.

                'Scientific opinions' are opinions formed via the scientific method, and so are necessarily evidence backed. A scientific opinion, representing the formally-agreed consensus of a scientific body or establishment, often takes the form of a published position paper citing the research producing the Scientific evidence upon which the opinion is based. 'The Scientific Opinion' can be compared to 'the public opinion' and means the complex collection of the opinions of many different scientific organizations and entities, and also the opinions of scientists undertaking scientific research in the relevant field.

                A Legal opinion is an opinion of a judge or group of judges that accompanies an order or ruling in a case, laying out the rationale and legal principles for the ruling.

                Public opinion is the aggregate of individual attitudes or beliefs held by the population. Public opinion can also be defined as the complex collection of opinions of many different people and the sum of all their views.

                See also

                * Platonic epistemology
                * Perspective (cognitive)

                Comment


                • Hay opiniones Que Ajan Y Estrujan El Alma y alejan de la verdad!

                  El término opinión tiene diferentes significados y diversos usos según ciertos contextos:

                  * Opinión (Filosofía): Grado de posesión de la verdad respecto de un conocimiento que se afirma como verdadero sin tener garantía de su validez. Se contrapone a la certeza como posesión plena de la verdad que se afirma sin sombra de duda acerca de su validez...

                  Yo solo se que se mucho...y bien sabido
                  Conosco de todo y para todo
                  Pero no con todo
                  Mi opinion es,a veces,un concepto o juicio que se forma de una cosa cuestionable

                  * Opinión (Periodismo): La opinión es un género periodístico que se caracteriza por la exposición y argumentación del pensamiento de un personaje o medio de comunicación más o menos reconocido acerca de algún tema o hecho.

                  La verdad de los hechos a veces dista mucho de la opinion sobre los hechos


                  * Opinión: Concepto valorativo que se tiene respecto a alguien, generalmente relativo a su fama.

                  Tu me puedes caer bien o caer mal a 1ª vista
                  Mi opinion es entonces sesgada

                  * Opinión: Estado de creencia común que tiene una colectividad respecto a determinado asunto. Su validez lógica como verdad no se fundamenta en el grado de conocimiento sino en la participación como miembro del grupo social. Véase ideología.

                  Las creencias comunes son opiniones vulgares

                  * Opinión pública: Estado de creencia que se atribuye a una determinada sociedad en su conjunto.

                  Lo público y lo privado a veces coincide en eso de las opiniones

                  * Estado de opinión: Situación que se da en una colectividad o grupo en un momento dado con respecto al estudio o tratamiento de un argumento determinado.

                  La impresión y el impacto forman opiniones instantaneas

                  Comment


                  • Re: Palabras encadenadas en ingles/Good or bad Luck,fortune

                    Luck is a way of understanding a personal chance event. Luck has three aspects which make it distinct from chance or probability.

                    * Luck is good or bad.
                    * Luck is by accident or chance.
                    * Luck applies to a person, a group of people or other actors.

                    Some examples of Luck:

                    * You win repeatedly at gambling, against significant odds.
                    * You correctly guess an answer in a quiz which you didn't know.
                    * Your car breaking down could be bad luck, if it was by chance and against the odds.

                    Interpretations of Luck

                    Luck is interpreted and understood in many different ways.

                    Luck as lack of control

                    Luck refers to that which happens to a person beyond that person's control. This view incorporates phenomena that are chance happenings, a person's place of birth for example, but where there is no uncertainty involved, or where the uncertainty is irrelevant. Within this framework one can differentiate between three different types of luck:

                    1. Constitutional luck, that is, luck with factors that cannot be changed. Place of birth and genetic constitution are typical examples.
                    2. Circumstantial luck - with factors that are haphazardly brought on. Accidents and epidemics are typical examples.
                    3. Ignorance luck, that is, luck with factors one does not know about. Examples can be identified only in hindsight.

                    Luck as a fallacy

                    Another view holds that "luck is probability taken personally." A rationalist approach to luck includes the application of the rules of probability, and an avoidance of unscientific beliefs.
                    The rationalist feels the belief in luck is a result of poor reasoning or wishful thinking. To a rationalist, a believer in luck who asserts that something has influenced his or her luck commits the "post hoc ergo propter hoc" logical fallacy: that because two events are connected sequentially, they are connected causally as well. In general:

                    A happens (luck-attracting event or action) and then B happens;
                    Therefore, A influenced B.

                    In the rationalist perspective, probability is only affected by confirmed causal connections.

                    The gambler's fallacy and inverse gambler's fallacy both explain some reasoning problems in common beliefs in luck. They involve denying the unpredictability of random events: "I haven't rolled a seven all week, so I'll definitely roll one tonight".

                    Luck is merely an expression noting an extended period of noted outcomes, completely consistent with random walk probability theory. Wishing one "good luck" will not cause such an extended period, but it expresses positive feelings toward the one—not necessarily wholly undesirable.

                    Luck as an essence

                    There is also a series of spiritual, or supernatural beliefs regarding fortune. These beliefs vary widely from one to another, but most agree that luck can be influenced through spiritual means by performing certain rituals or by avoiding certain circumstances.

                    One such activity is prayer, a religious practice in which this belief is particularly strong. Many cultures and religions worldwide place a strong emphasis on a person's ability to influence their fortune by ritualistic means, sometimes involving sacrifice, omens or spells. Others associate luck with a strong sense of superstition, that is, a belief that certain taboo or blessed actions will influence how fortune favors them for the future.

                    Luck can also be a belief in an organization of fortunate and unfortunate events.
                    Luck is a form of superstition which is interpreted differently by different individuals.
                    Famous Swiss psychiatrist, Carl Jung, who founded analytical psychology, coined the term "synchronicity", which he described as "a meaningful coincidence".

                    Christianity and Islam believe in the will of a supreme being rather than luck as the primary influence in future events.
                    The degrees of this Divine Providence vary greatly from one person to another; however, most acknowledge providence as at least a partial, if not complete influence on luck.
                    These religions, in their early development, accommodated many traditional practices.
                    Each, at different times, accepted omens and practiced forms of ritual sacrifice in order to divine the will of their supreme being or to influence divine favoritism.
                    The concept of "Divine Grace" as it is described by believers closely resembles what is referred to as "luck" by others.

                    Mesoamerican religions, such as the Aztecs, Mayans and Incas, had particularly strong beliefs regarding the relationship between rituals and luck. In these cultures, human sacrifice (both of willing volunteers and captured enemies) was seen as a way to please the gods and earn favor for the city offering the sacrifice. The Mayans also believed in blood offerings, where men or women wanting to earn favor with the gods, to bring about good luck, would cut themselves and bleed on the gods' altar.

                    Many traditional African practices, such as voodoo and hoodoo, have a strong belief in superstition. Some of these religions include a belief that third parties can influence an individual's luck.
                    Shamans and witches are both respected and feared, based on their ability to cause good or bad fortune for those in villages near them.

                    Comment


                    • Re: hechos inexplicables:¿A veces,cuestion de suerte?

                      Se llama suerte a la creencia en una organización de los sucesos afortunados y desafortunados.
                      Es una forma de superstición interpretada de forma diferente por individuos diferentes.

                      * 1 La suerte como falacia
                      * 2 La suerte como esencia

                      Una aproximación racionalista a la suerte incluye la aplicación de las leyes de la probabilidad y la elusión de creencias acientíficas.
                      El racionalista siente que la creencia en la suerte es el resultado de un razonamiento pobre o pensamiento ilusorio. Para un racionalista, un creyente en la suerte comete la falacia lógica post hoc:

                      A ocurre (llevo mi camisa de la suerte) y entonces B ocurre (algo bueno)
                      Por tanto, A causó B

                      En la visión racionalista del mundo, la probabilidad sólo está afectada por relaciones causales confirmadas. Que un ladrillo caiga sobre una persona que camine bajo él, por tanto, no está en función de la suerte de dicha persona, sino que es el resultado de la colección de ocurrencias comprensibles (o explicables). Estadísticamente, cualquier persona que camine bajo el edificio tenía probabilidades de que le cayese el ladrillo.

                      Un acercamiento racionalista alternativo a la suerte es contrastarla con el control.
                      La suerte es lo que sucede más allá del control de una persona. Este punto de vista incorpora fenómenos que son acontecimientos accidentales, por ejemplo el lugar de nacimiento de una persona, pero en los que no hay incertidumbre alguna o ésta es irrelevante. Dentro de este marco pueden diferenciarse tres tipos de suerte:

                      1. Suerte constitucional, es decir, con factores fuera del control de una persona porque no pueden ser cambiados. El lugar de nacimiento y la constitución genética son ejemplos típicos.
                      2. Suerte circunstancial, es decir, con factores que no pueden ser controlados porque se producen aleatoriamente. Los accidentes y epidemias son ejemplos típicos.
                      3. Suerte consecuente, es decir, con factores que no pueden controlarse por ser el resultado caprichoso de tus actos. Un ejemplo típico sería arrojar un piedra desde un acantilado. Como golpear a alguien que pase por debajo es consecuencia de numerosos factores fuera de tu control, entonces es cuestión de suerte.

                      Tanto la falacia del jugador como la falacia inversa del jugador explican algunos problemas de razonamiento de las creencias comunes en la suerte. Ambas implican negar la impredicibilidad de los sucesos aleatorios: «No he lanzado un seis en toda la semana, así que seguro que lanzaré uno esta noche.»

                      La suerte como esencia

                      Hay también una serie de creencias espirituales o sobrenaturales sobre la suerte, variando ampliamente de unas a otras, aunque la mayoría coinciden en que puede influirse en la suerte con medios espirituales realizando ciertos rituales o evitando ciertas situaciones.

                      Una de estas actividades es la oración, una práctica religiosa en la que esta creencia es especialmente fuerte. Muchas culturas y religiones de todo el mundo ponen un especial énfasis en la habilidad de las personas para influir sobre su suerte por medios rituales, a veces incluyendo sacrificios, presagios o hechizos. Otros asocian la suerte con un fuerte sentido de superstición, es decir, una creencia de que ciertos actos tabú o benditos influencian la forma en que la suerte les favorecerá en el futuro.

                      Carl Jung definió el principio de sincronicidad como la «ocurrencial temporalmente coincidente de sucesos acasuales». Jung describió las coincidencias como un efecto del inconsciente colectivo.

                      Las religiones judeocristiana e islámica creen en la voluntad de un ser supremo más que en la suerte como principal influencia en los sucesos futuros. Los grados de esta divina providencia varían ampliante de una secta a otra, pero la mayoría la reconocen como una influencia parcial, si no completa, sobre la suerte. Estas religiones, en sus primeras etapas de desarrollo, contuvieron muchas prácticas tradicionales por sus razones. Todas ellas, en diferentes épocas, aceptaron los presagios y formas prácticas de sacrificios rituales para adivinar la voluntad de su ser supremo o para influir sobre su favoritismo.

                      Las religiones mesoamericana, como las de aztecas, mayas e incas, tenían creencias especialmente fuertes sobre la relación entre rituales y la suerte. En estas culturas, el sacrificio humano (tanto de voluntarios como de enemigos presos) era considerado una forma de complacer a los dioses y ganar sus favores para la ciudad que ofrecía el sacrificio. Entre los mayas, que también creían en las ofrendas de sangre, los hombres o mujeres que querían ganarse el favor de los dioses para atraer la buena suerte se hacían cortes y vertían su sangre sobre el altar de los dioses.

                      Muchas religiones africanas como el vudú y el hudú tienen fuertes creencias en la superstición. Algunas de ellas incluyen la creencia de que terceros pueden influir en la suerte individual. Las chamanes y brujas son amados y temidos por su habilidad para proporcionar buena o mala suerte a los que viven en pueblos cercanos a ellos.

                      La suerte como placebo

                      Algunos fomentan la creencia en la suerte como una falsa idea, pero que pueden derivar en pensamiento positivo y alterar las respuestas de uno a mejor. Otros, como Jean Paul Sartre y Sigmund Freud, creen que la creencia en la suerte tiene más relación con un locus de control para los sucesos de la propia vida y la subsiguiente huida de responsabilidad personal. Según esta teoría, quien atribuye sus penalidades a la «mala suerte» hallarán tras un examen más atento que llevan un estilo de vida arriesgado. Por otra parte, la gente que se considera «afortunada» al tener buena salud pueden estar en realidad cosechando los beneficios de una actitud positiva y unas relaciones sociales satisfactorias, lo que estadísticamente se sabe que protege contra las enfermedades relacionadas con el estrés. Si ocurren sucesos «buenos» y «malos» aleatoriamente a todo el mundo, los creyentes en la buena suerte experimentarán una ganancia neta de su fortuna, y viceversa para los creyentes en la mala suerte.

                      Manifestaciones

                      Numerología

                      La mayoría de las culturas consideran que algunos números son afortunados o desafortunados. Esto resulta especialmente fuerte en las cultura asiáticas, donde conseguir números de teléfono, matrículas de automóviles y direcciones postales «afortunadas» se buscan activamente, a veces a cambio de elevadas sumas de dinero. En China se considera el número 8 como la cifra de la suerte.

                      En la Biblia

                      La relación de Isaías 65:11 con las creencias sobre la suerte es objeto de controversia.

                      Salmos 22:18

                      Mateo 27:35

                      Hechos 1:26

                      Objetos y sucesos

                      Diversos objetos y sucesos se consideran afortunados o desafortunados.

                      Afortunados
                      Trébol de cuatro hojas.

                      * Encontrar una moneda con la cara hacia arriba
                      * Herraduras
                      * Trébol de cuatro hojas
                      * Pata de conejo
                      * Mariquitas
                      * Elefantes con la trompa hacia arriba
                      * El número siete
                      * Tocar madera
                      * Cruzar los dedos
                      * Tener tu piedra natalicia de la suerte sea preciosa o semipreciosa
                      * Collar de ajos

                      Desafortunados

                      * Martes 13 (en algunas culturas, el viernes 13)
                      * El número 13 (en algunos lugares se salta la planta 13 en los edificios)
                      * Un gato negro cruzando tu camino
                      * Romper un espejo (siete años de mala suerte)
                      * Derramar sal
                      * Poner un sombrero sobre la cama
                      * Abrir un paraguas en el interior de la casa
                      * Matar una mariquita
                      * Matar una araña dentro de casa
                      * Caminar bajo una escalera
                      * Decir «buena suerte»
                      * Contestar «gracias» a quien te desee buena suerte
                      * Recoger una moneda con la cara hacia abajo (puede evitarse regalándola)
                      * Poner zapatos sobre una mesa (en el Reino Unido se considera que esto trae suerte extremadamente mala, tradicionalmente la muerte de una persona de la casa; a veces se especifica que sólo trae muerte si los zapatos son nuevos)
                      * En un barco, tradicionalmente se consideraba desafortunado llevar una mujer a bordo
                      * Entre los marineros se considera que matar un albatros o una marsopa trae mala suerte
                      * Entre los marineros se considera desafortunado llevar algo azul a bordo
                      * Desear «buena suerte» a un actor que va a salir a escena (se prefiere desearle que se rompa una pierna)
                      * Entre los actores se considera que vestir de amarillo o llevar algo amarillo en una obra de teatro trae muy mala suerte por que Molière murio actuando en una obra de teatro vestido de tal color, y es mayormente evitado.
                      * Ver una urraca
                      * Que un pájaro entre volando por la ventana (suele decirse que significa que una persona de la familia morirá ese día o murió la noche anterior)
                      * Reflejar la luz del sol en un metal

                      Véase también

                      * Destino
                      * Dioses de la fortuna
                      * Estadística
                      * Irracionalidad
                      * Karma
                      * Magia
                      * Mal de ojo
                      * Maldición
                      * Pensamiento mágico
                      * Principio de sincronicidad
                      * Probabilidad
                      * Religión popular
                      * Rutilismo
                      * Superstición

                      Comment


                      • Re: Guadalajara en un llano y México en una laguna....

                        A la'cuenca de México'sin duda mayormente le deberia de sobrar siempre bastante agua...y que se manifiesta en rios, arroyos,subterraneos o no,lagos varios,y numerosos grandes mantos acuiferos subterraneos...y + con la que le llega de'fueras'como la de Cutzamala y la cuenca del Lerma,del valle de Toluca...pero desperdiciamos y mal usamos mucha,además de sacando continuamente un gran caudal fuera del'valle de México',mismo que mayormente debidamente tratado se podria reinyectar continuamente en muchos de los acuiferos subterraneos,reconstituyendolos...

                        Comment


                        • Re: ~~Juguemos Bilingüe~~

                          Thought and thinking are mental forms and processes, respectively ("thought" is both). Thinking allows beings to model the world and to deal with it according to their motives, plans, ends and desires. Words referring to similar concepts and processes include cognition, sentience, consciousness, idea, and imagination. [1]

                          * 1 Definition
                          * 2 Representative reactions towards stimuli from internal chemical reactions or external environmental factors. The word comes from Old English . þoht, geþoht, from stem of þencan "to conceive of in the mind, consider" [2]

                          In common language, the word thinking covers numerous diverse psychological activities. It is sometimes a synonym for “tending to believe,” especially with less than full confidence (“I think that it will rain, but I am not sure”). At other times it denotes the degree of attentiveness (“I did it without thinking”) or whatever is in consciousness, especially if it refers to something outside the immediate environment (“It made me think of my grandmother”).

                          Biology

                          Neurons

                          A neuron also known as a neurone or nerve cell) is an excitable cell in the nervous system that processes and transmits information by electrochemical signalling. Neurons are the core components of the brain, the vertebrate spinal cord, the invertebrate ventral nerve cord, and the peripheral nerves. A number of specialized types of neurons exist: sensory neurons respond to touch, sound, light and numerous other stimuli affecting cells of the sensory organs that then send signals to the spinal cord and brain. Motor neurons receive signals from the brain and spinal cord and cause muscle contractions and affect glands. Interneurons connect neurons to other neurons within the brain and spinal cord. Neurons respond to stimuli, and communicate the presence of stimuli to the central nervous system, which processes that information and sends responses to other parts of the body for action. Neurons do not go through mitosis, and usually cannot be replaced after being destroyed, although astrocytes have been observed to turn into neurons as they are sometimes pluripotent.


                          Psychology

                          Cognitive psychology

                          Psychologists have concentrated on thinking as an intellectual exertion aimed at finding an answer to a question or the solution of a practical problem.

                          Cognitive psychology is a branch of psychology that investigates internal mental processes such as problem solving, memory, and language.

                          The school of thought arising from this approach is known as cognitivism which is interested in how people mentally represent information processing.
                          It had its foundations in the Gestalt psychology of Max Wertheimer, Wolfgang Köhler, and Kurt Koffka [3] , and in the work of Jean Piaget, who provided a theory of stages/phases that describe children's cognitive development.
                          Cognitive psychologists use psychophysical and experimental approaches to understand, diagnose, and solve problems, concerning themselves with the mental processes which mediate between stimulus and response.
                          Cognitive theory contends that solutions to problems take the form of algorithms—rules that are not necessarily understood but promise a solution, or heuristics—rules that are understood but that do not always guarantee solutions.
                          Cognitive science differs from cognitive psychology in that algorithms that are intended to simulate human behavior are implemented or implementable on a computer. In other instances, solutions may be found through insight, a sudden awareness of relationships.

                          Id, ego, and super-ego are the three parts of the "psychic apparatus" defined in Sigmund Freud's structural model of the psyche; they are the three theoretical constructs in terms of whose activity and interaction mental life is described.
                          According to this model, the uncoordinated instinctual trends are the "id"; the organized realistic part of the psyche is the "ego," and the critical and moralizing function the "super-ego." [4]

                          The unconscious was considered by Freud throughout the evolution of his psychoanalytic theory a sentient force of will influenced by human desire and yet operating well below the perceptual conscious mind.
                          For Freud, the unconscious is the storehouse of instinctual desires, needs, and psychic drives. While past thoughts and reminiscences may be concealed from immediate consciousness, they direct the thoughts and feelings of the individual from the realm of the unconscious.[5]

                          For psychoanalysis, the unconscious does not include all that is not conscious, rather only what is actively repressed from conscious thought or what the person is averse to knowing consciously. In a sense this view places the self in relationship to their unconscious as an adversary, warring with itself to keep what is unconscious hidden. If a person feels pain, all he can think of is alleviating the pain. Any of his desires, to get rid of pain or enjoy something, command the mind what to do.
                          For Freud, the unconscious was a repository for socially unacceptable ideas, wishes or desires, traumatic memories, and painful emotions put out of mind by the mechanism of psychological repression. However, the contents did not necessarily have to be solely negative. In the psychoanalytic view, the unconscious is a force that can only be recognized by its effects — it expresses itself in the symptom. [6]

                          Sociology

                          Social psychology

                          Social psychology is the study of how people and groups interact. Scholars in this interdisciplinary area are typically either psychologists or sociologists, though all social psychologists employ both the individual and the group as their units of analysis.[7]

                          Despite their similarity, psychological and sociological researchers tend to differ in their goals, approaches, methods, and terminology. They also favor separate academic journals and professional societies. The greatest period of collaboration between sociologists and psychologists was during the years immediately following World War II.[8] Although there has been increasing isolation and specialization in recent years, some degree of overlap and influence remains between the two disciplines.[9]

                          The Collective unconscious, sometimes known as collective subconscious, is a term of analytical psychology, coined by Carl Jung. It is a part of the unconscious mind, shared by a society, a people, or all humanity, in a interconnected system that is the product of all common experiences and contains such concepts as science, religion, and morality.
                          While Freud did not distinguish between an "individual psychology" and a "collective psychology", Jung distinguished the collective unconscious from the personal subconscious particular to each human being. The collective unconscious is also known as "a reservoir of the experiences of our species."[10]

                          In the "Definitions" chapter of Jung's seminal work Psychological Types, under the definition of "collective" Jung references representations collectives, a term coined by Levy-Bruhl in his 1910 book How Natives Think. Jung says this is what he describes as the collective unconscious. Freud, on the other hand, did not accept the idea of a collective unconscious...

                          Comment


                          • El Pensamiento,¿Que es?

                            El pensamiento es la actividad y creación de la mente; dícese de todo aquello que es traído a existencia mediante la actividad del intelecto.
                            El término es comúnmente utilizado como forma genérica que define todos los productos que la mente puede generar incluyendo las actividades racionales del intelecto o las abstracciones de la imaginación; todo aquello que sea de naturaleza mental es considerado pensamiento, bien sean estos abstractos, racionales, creativos, artísticos, etc.

                            * 1- Definiciones
                            * 2- Características
                            * Imagen: son las representaciones virtuales que tienen todos los seres humanos desde su concepción acerca del proceso psicológico racional, subjetivo e interno de conocer, comprender, juzgar y razonar los procesos, objetivos y hechos.


                            * Lenguaje: es la función de expresión del pensamiento en forma escrita para la comunicación y el entendimiento de los seres humanos. Nos plantea dos definiciones de pensamiento, una de las cuales se relaciona directamente con la resolución de problemas.


                            * Pensamiento: fenómeno psicológico racional, objetivo y externo derivado sobre todo del pensar para la solución de problemas que nos aquejan día tras día.

                            -"El proceso de pensamiento es un medio de planificar la acción y de superar los obstáculos entre lo que hay y lo que se proyecta".
                            - "El pensamiento se podría definir como imágenes, ensoñaciones o esa voz interior que nos acompaña durante el día y en la noche en forma de sueños". La estructura del pensamiento o los patrones cognitivos son el andamiaje mental sobre el que conceptualizamos nuestra experiencia o nuestra realidad.

                            Características

                            * El pensar lógico se caracteriza porque opera mediante conceptos y razonamientos.
                            * Existen patrones que tienen un comienzo en el pensamiento y hace que el pensamiento tenga un final, esto sucede en milésimas de segundos, a su vez miles de comienzos y finales hacen de esto un pensamiento lógico; esto depende del medio de afuera y para estar en contacto con ello dependemos de los cinco sentidos.
                            * El pensar siempre responde a una motivación, que puede estar originada en el ambiente natural, social o cultural, o en el sujeto pensante.
                            * El pensar es una resolución de problemas. La necesidad exige satisfacción.
                            * El proceso del pensar lógico siempre sigue una determinada dirección. Esta dirección va en busca de una conclusión o de la solución de un problema, no sigue propiamente una línea recta sino más bien zigzagueante con avances, paradas, rodeos y hasta retrocesos.
                            * El proceso de pensar se presenta como una totalidad coherente y organizada, en lo que respecta a sus diversos aspectos, modalidades, elementos y etapas.
                            * El pensamiento es simplemente el arte de ordenar las matemáticas, y expresarlas a través del sistema lingüístico.
                            * Las personas poseen una tendencia al equilibrio, una especie de impulso hacia el crecimiento, la salud y el ajuste.
                            Existen una serie de condiciones que impiden y bloquean esta tendencia, el aprendizaje de un concepto negativo de sí mismo, es quizás una de las condiciones bloqueadoras más importantes.
                            Un concepto equivocado o negativo de sí mismo deriva de experiencias de desaprobación o ambivalencia hacia el sujeto en las etapas tempranas de su vida.

                            Clasificación

                            * Pensamiento deductivo: va de lo general a lo particular. Es una forma de razonamiento de la que se desprende una conclusión a partir de una o varias premisas.
                            * Pensamiento inductivo: es el proceso inverso del pensamiento deductivo, es el que va de lo particular a lo general. La base es, la figuración de que si algo es cierto en algunas ocasiones, lo será en otras similares aunque no se puedan observar.
                            * Pensamiento analítico: realiza la separación del todo en partes que son identificadas o categorizadas.
                            * Pensamiento de síntesis: es la reunión de un todo por la conjunción de sus partes.
                            * Pensamiento creativo: aquel que se utiliza en la creación o modificación de algo, introduciendo novedades, es decir, la producción de nuevas ideas para desarrollar o modificar algo existente.
                            * Pensamiento sistémico: es una visión compleja de múltiples elementos con sus diversas interrelaciones. Sistémico deriva de la palabra sistema, lo que nos indica que debemos ver las cosas de forma interrelacionada.
                            * Pensamiento crítico: examina la estructura de los razonamientos sobre cuestiones de la vida diaria, y tiene una doble vertiente analítica y evaluativa. Intenta superar el aspecto mecánico del estudio de la lógica. Es evaluar el conocimiento, decidiendo lo que uno realmente cree y por qué. Se esfuerza por tener consistencia en los conocimientos que acepta y entre el conocimiento y la acción.
                            * Pensamiento interrogativo: es el pensamiento con el que se hacen preguntas, identificando lo que a uno le interesa saber sobre un tema determinado.

                            Relación entre el pensamiento y el lenguaje

                            * El pensamiento no sólo se refleja en el lenguaje, sino que lo determina.
                            * El pensamiento precisa el lenguaje.
                            * El lenguaje transmite los conceptos, juicios y raciocinios del pensamiento.
                            * El pensamiento se conserva y se fija a través del lenguaje.
                            * El lenguaje ayuda al pensamiento a hacerse cada vez más concreto.
                            * El pensamiento es la pasión del ser racional, del que procura descubrir hasta lo más mínimo y lo convierte en un conocimiento.
                            * El pensamiento involucra una estructura conocida como "la estructura del pensamiento".
                            * El lenguaje es simplemente un manejo de símbolos (dígase codificación), el pensamiento es un acondicionador del lenguaje.
                            * El pensamiento es el límite a la acción inconsciente, generada en la mayoría de los casos por mensajes errados o mal interpretados.
                            * Las formas del lenguaje se basan en el pensamiento, sin embargo estas no tienen una relacion de paralelismo, sino que son mutuamente dependientes.

                            Operaciones racionales

                            * Análisis- División mental; es decir el pensamiento se divide en dos formas izquierda y derecha. El lado derecho puede pensar todo lo negativo y el izquierdo todo lo positivo.
                            * Síntesis-Se reúne todo lo mental para luego ser analizado o recordado.
                            * Comparación- Establece semejanzas y diferencias entre los distintos objetos y fenómenos de la realidad.
                            * Generalización- Proceso en el que se establece lo común de un conjunto de objetos, fenómenos y relaciones.
                            * Abstracción- Operación que consiste en mostrar mentalmente ciertos rasgos, generalmente ocultados por la persona, distinguiéndose de rasgos y anexos accidentales, primarios y prescindiendo de aquellos pensamientos.

                            Patologías

                            Los trastornos del pensamiento suelen ser divididos en trastornos del curso, del contenido del pensamiento y, en ciertos casos se añade un tercer grupo, los trastornos de la vivencia del pensamiento.

                            Trastornos del curso del pensamiento

                            Los trastornos del curso del pensamiento incluyen patologías de la fluidez del pensamiento, es decir, como se formulan, organizan y presentan los pensamientos de un individuo.

                            Trastornos de la velocidad

                            Los trastornos de la velocidad incluyen patologías que afectan la cantidad y la velocidad de los pensamientos.
                            Sus principales trastornos son los siguientes:[1]

                            * Taquipsiquia o pensamiento acelerado
                            * Fuga de ideas en la que el pensamiento parece saltar súbitamente de un tema a otro
                            * Bradipsiquia o pensamiento inhibido
                            * Bloqueo o interrupción brusca del pensamiento antes de completar la idea

                            Trastornos de la forma

                            Los trastornos de la forma propiamente dicha incluyen patologías de la direccionalidad y la continuidad del pensamiento. Los más significativos incluyen:[1]

                            * Pensamiento circunstancial, cuando la información compartida es excesiva, redundante y, por lo general, no relacionada con el tema
                            * Pensamiento divagatorio
                            * Pensamiento tangencial, la incapacidad para la asociación de pensamientos objetivos
                            * Pensamiento prolijo
                            * Disgregación
                            * Incoherencia

                            Trastornos del contenido del pensamiento

                            Las principales incluyen:[1]

                            * Preocupaciones
                            * Ideas falsas, por lo general reversible
                            * Ideas obsesivas
                            * Ideas fóbicas
                            * Pensamiento mágico

                            Véase también

                            * Pensamiento crítico

                            Bibliografía

                            1. ↑ a b c Julio Vallejo Ruiloba Introducción a la psicopatología y la Psiquiatría (en español). Publicado por Elsevier España, 2006; pág 187-190. ISBN 8445816594

                            * Luís María Gonzalo Sanz. Entre libertad y determinismo. Genes, cerebro y ambiente en la conducta humana. Cristiandad: Madrid (2007). ISBN 978-84-7057-519-8

                            Comment


                            • En todo momento estoy pensando...porque tengo ACTIVIDAD MENTAL!

                              El conjunto de todos los procesos que se realizan en la mente es el PENSAMIENTO...

                              Comment


                              • Re: Las Cosas Más Importantes de la Vida en este Tiempo

                                1-Pensar bien...
                                2-Actuar mejor..
                                3-Sufrir menos...

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X