Tweet
Re: nomás la puntita.....
#opcorrupcion
http://~~~~~~~.com/6sstrum
#opcorrupcion
http://~~~~~~~.com/6sstrum
Published by Reformacom
The never ending Mexican image …
….it doesn’t matter if a police officer takes a bribe for unfulfilling his job, also it doesn’t matter being Mexico City’s mayor, ( whom has been appointed as the best city mayor of the whole world, by someone that of course, doesn’t live in Mexico City) (they also have forgotten than when he was Chief of Mexico City’s police, he allowed a mob to burn alive two (2) [II] federal police officers, and we all Mexicans watched the horrible fact by TV) ) looking to protect a small Group investors’ interest; the private interest of a small group of real state investors;
It couldn’t care less that a corrupt judge, gave permission to such investors, breaking the development regulations for the zone. ( that will serve for the mayor of the borough, Demetrio Sodi de La Tijera, to wash his hands, pointing the fault to the judiciary system as the responsible for such law violations that will lower the inhabitants life quality in what was Mexico City’s greenest west side
For all written before and taking the Christmas Holiday seasons from December 12th. to January 6th., the investor Group didn’t respect the demolitions’ restraining order issued by the National Institute of Fine Arts, to preserve the old building, so they demolished without any permit..
In the early days of December, our corrupt authorities had informed to us, likewise His French Majesty Louis XIV ( yes that one that had said He was The State) that the building will be constructed, without taking into account any neighbor public opinion, and (SIC) “as to alleviate the impact and harm to the enviroment, we will count with bicycles, so we wouldn’t harm the green enviroment,”
Of course that the borough mayor, Demetrio Sodi De La Tijera didn’t show his face to the meetings:
He only sent his employees, like Mr. Ricardo Pascoe Pierce, whose task was to make a mockery of the meeting.
It also doesn’t matter what Denise Dresser writes today in Reforma newspaper
Public evil
By Denise Dresser
On what side does stands mayor Marcelo Ebrard? from the law side or its selective application? From the greedy developers or common citizens? From the multimillion profit side for a few, or from the side of urban improvements with benefits for many? From the side of right planning or the harming improvisation? Form the side of a city that provides public welfare to their inhabitants, or the side of a city that allows its privatization? Main and critical questions. Questions that go to heart of how the power is exercised, an behalf of whom relevant questions to Marcelo Ebrard, since he is standing in the wrong side.
Here in a City nodal point near the crossroad between Paseo de La Reforma avenue, and Periferico there is a microcosm of opacity and highhandedness, collusion and corruption, flexed authorities, accomplice authorities. Here in a 25 store tower , that will bring 7,000 people with all their cars to a zone already overflowed, - is the best example of the worst practices. Real state developers that already got a constitutional guarantee for protection of their rights to infringe the law, even the area residents have to being compelled to respect it. Authorities that state themselves powerless before the construction of a building that breaks a lot of regulations over the environment and traffic impact. A business Group, -Danhos- that gets privileges and permits, that aren’t granted to a common citizenship, but those with buddies in Mexico City’s government. fait accomplif – like the demolition Vladimir Kaspé building demolished, taking advantage of the Christmas Holidays, that are a mockery to the neighbors. An affront to citizens, a violation to the general rules for urban development..
Before that what surprise more is Marcelo Ebrard willingness His silence. The schizophrenia shown by the Mayor of the year”` when he promotes the bicycle and metrobus use, but on the other hand he allows a project that encourage vehicle use, and the private appropiation of public spaces. The contradiction in which someone falls that for good reasons , was opposed to the Bicentennial Tower and now allows an equal structure to be built in the same place.
And what to s ay about the borough mayor Demetrio Sodi,[7b] that states that he isn’t going to be a neighbor’s .martyr, when his duty is to represent them. Or the City environment responsible, Martha Delgado, that as it seems, she agrees with the arrival of more than two thousand daily car, - that will form a line of more than seven miles to enter the building- to blocks from Chapultepec Forest. Teodoro González de León, one of the most respected architects in Mexico, involved in a Project that implies traffic chaos and environment destruction, the worst urban bullying caused by Dahnos Group and the obvious collusion from the authorities that allow it
[/SIZE]
And in a failed attempt to defend the unjustifiable , both Dahnos Group and government argue thay the Project has a constitutional guarantee for the protection of their own private rights to build a 25 store tower. A guarantee granted over a questionable conditions, whose honesty is not shown. A guarantee that shouldn’t be a permission to break other regulation in the zone. A guarantee that it is Only for the number of stores, but that shouldn’t provide coverage to ignore the development planning for Chapultepec Forest. A guarantee that has become a way to show something as a fait accompli , if the best city mayor would really apply the law with equity ( By the way this was the motto of his campaign)
To them as is shown, he allow to break the law to permit the same traffic jam over Paseo de la Reforma for any event in the Auditory , two times per day and 5 days of the week,. To them ensures all benefits even will generate public costs.
This is whar happens when a government isn’t capable to value general regulations for all. When the business is form a multimillion contractor is over the right of the neighborghood when there aren´t any crystal clear rules neither sanctions to those who ignore them. When the authority yields and allows, negociating the law and lets that everyone a street vendor, a street car washer or a powerful group like Dahnos interprets the law to their own will, a scenery iis created where everyone does what they please. They take possession of one street, or construct a building that goes against the prevailing regulation or they take gun handed whatever they wish. The city and the nations becomes a Hobbes environment where the willingness of the strongest, the more corrupt the one with more contacts under government , the one who can furnish the largest briefcase full of money wins,
From all this is the inerative to summon Marcelo Ebrard to be responsible for all that he`s allowing. To require an explanation of all the action that resemble a corrupt or a colluded government. To insist where he is standing and behalf of whom he is governing. To stop a construction to benefirt a few private intere$t$ , while he produce great public evil
Responsable de la Traduccion: Rafael Norma Méndez
Copyright © Grupo Reforma Servicio Informativo
The never ending Mexican image …
….it doesn’t matter if a police officer takes a bribe for unfulfilling his job, also it doesn’t matter being Mexico City’s mayor, ( whom has been appointed as the best city mayor of the whole world, by someone that of course, doesn’t live in Mexico City) (they also have forgotten than when he was Chief of Mexico City’s police, he allowed a mob to burn alive two (2) [II] federal police officers, and we all Mexicans watched the horrible fact by TV) ) looking to protect a small Group investors’ interest; the private interest of a small group of real state investors;
It couldn’t care less that a corrupt judge, gave permission to such investors, breaking the development regulations for the zone. ( that will serve for the mayor of the borough, Demetrio Sodi de La Tijera, to wash his hands, pointing the fault to the judiciary system as the responsible for such law violations that will lower the inhabitants life quality in what was Mexico City’s greenest west side
For all written before and taking the Christmas Holiday seasons from December 12th. to January 6th., the investor Group didn’t respect the demolitions’ restraining order issued by the National Institute of Fine Arts, to preserve the old building, so they demolished without any permit..
In the early days of December, our corrupt authorities had informed to us, likewise His French Majesty Louis XIV ( yes that one that had said He was The State) that the building will be constructed, without taking into account any neighbor public opinion, and (SIC) “as to alleviate the impact and harm to the enviroment, we will count with bicycles, so we wouldn’t harm the green enviroment,”
Of course that the borough mayor, Demetrio Sodi De La Tijera didn’t show his face to the meetings:
He only sent his employees, like Mr. Ricardo Pascoe Pierce, whose task was to make a mockery of the meeting.
It also doesn’t matter what Denise Dresser writes today in Reforma newspaper
Public evil
By Denise Dresser
On what side does stands mayor Marcelo Ebrard? from the law side or its selective application? From the greedy developers or common citizens? From the multimillion profit side for a few, or from the side of urban improvements with benefits for many? From the side of right planning or the harming improvisation? Form the side of a city that provides public welfare to their inhabitants, or the side of a city that allows its privatization? Main and critical questions. Questions that go to heart of how the power is exercised, an behalf of whom relevant questions to Marcelo Ebrard, since he is standing in the wrong side.
Here in a City nodal point near the crossroad between Paseo de La Reforma avenue, and Periferico there is a microcosm of opacity and highhandedness, collusion and corruption, flexed authorities, accomplice authorities. Here in a 25 store tower , that will bring 7,000 people with all their cars to a zone already overflowed, - is the best example of the worst practices. Real state developers that already got a constitutional guarantee for protection of their rights to infringe the law, even the area residents have to being compelled to respect it. Authorities that state themselves powerless before the construction of a building that breaks a lot of regulations over the environment and traffic impact. A business Group, -Danhos- that gets privileges and permits, that aren’t granted to a common citizenship, but those with buddies in Mexico City’s government. fait accomplif – like the demolition Vladimir Kaspé building demolished, taking advantage of the Christmas Holidays, that are a mockery to the neighbors. An affront to citizens, a violation to the general rules for urban development..
Before that what surprise more is Marcelo Ebrard willingness His silence. The schizophrenia shown by the Mayor of the year”` when he promotes the bicycle and metrobus use, but on the other hand he allows a project that encourage vehicle use, and the private appropiation of public spaces. The contradiction in which someone falls that for good reasons , was opposed to the Bicentennial Tower and now allows an equal structure to be built in the same place.
And what to s ay about the borough mayor Demetrio Sodi,[7b] that states that he isn’t going to be a neighbor’s .martyr, when his duty is to represent them. Or the City environment responsible, Martha Delgado, that as it seems, she agrees with the arrival of more than two thousand daily car, - that will form a line of more than seven miles to enter the building- to blocks from Chapultepec Forest. Teodoro González de León, one of the most respected architects in Mexico, involved in a Project that implies traffic chaos and environment destruction, the worst urban bullying caused by Dahnos Group and the obvious collusion from the authorities that allow it
[/SIZE]
And in a failed attempt to defend the unjustifiable , both Dahnos Group and government argue thay the Project has a constitutional guarantee for the protection of their own private rights to build a 25 store tower. A guarantee granted over a questionable conditions, whose honesty is not shown. A guarantee that shouldn’t be a permission to break other regulation in the zone. A guarantee that it is Only for the number of stores, but that shouldn’t provide coverage to ignore the development planning for Chapultepec Forest. A guarantee that has become a way to show something as a fait accompli , if the best city mayor would really apply the law with equity ( By the way this was the motto of his campaign)
To them as is shown, he allow to break the law to permit the same traffic jam over Paseo de la Reforma for any event in the Auditory , two times per day and 5 days of the week,. To them ensures all benefits even will generate public costs.
This is whar happens when a government isn’t capable to value general regulations for all. When the business is form a multimillion contractor is over the right of the neighborghood when there aren´t any crystal clear rules neither sanctions to those who ignore them. When the authority yields and allows, negociating the law and lets that everyone a street vendor, a street car washer or a powerful group like Dahnos interprets the law to their own will, a scenery iis created where everyone does what they please. They take possession of one street, or construct a building that goes against the prevailing regulation or they take gun handed whatever they wish. The city and the nations becomes a Hobbes environment where the willingness of the strongest, the more corrupt the one with more contacts under government , the one who can furnish the largest briefcase full of money wins,
From all this is the inerative to summon Marcelo Ebrard to be responsible for all that he`s allowing. To require an explanation of all the action that resemble a corrupt or a colluded government. To insist where he is standing and behalf of whom he is governing. To stop a construction to benefirt a few private intere$t$ , while he produce great public evil
Responsable de la Traduccion: Rafael Norma Méndez
Copyright © Grupo Reforma Servicio Informativo
Tampoco importa que en aras de un presunta mejora en el caos vi(a)l de esta ciudad se hagan segundos pisos sobe el periférico, provocando una mayor contaminación, al beneficiar al transporte privado de personas. 
no creo que sea de más de 15 kilómetros de ida y vuelta. . es una verdadera pena que no pueda enviar mis archivos fotográficos mediante señales de humo 
“zonas residenciales”
"universidad"
Comment